Two stories for the faithful readers involving sexual perverts. One is about a disgusting woman who allegedly took advantage of an autistic boy, compelling him to perform oral sex on her. The other is about an electrician setting up peeping tom cameras in the bathrooms of women he deemed "hot".
Is it really this hard to get laid in the 21st Century?
Here are some excerpts for your perusal:
A 30-year- old woman accused of persuading a 13-year-old autistic boy to perform oral sex on her was arrested last week and charged with committing a lewd or lascivious act with a child.
Margarita Oropeza of Ontario lived next door to the De Anza Middle School student in the 1300 block of South Sultana Avenue, according to a police report attached to her court file.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Sheriff's deputies believe David Mitchell Clark, 34, of Rancho Cucamonga, may have victimized several other people, because a search of his home yielded video footage of unidentified women in bathrooms.
Clark was arrested last week and charged with two felony counts of burglary and two misdemeanor "peeping Tom" charges.
He pleaded not guilty to the charges in West Valley Superior Court on Friday and remains in custody at West Valley Detention Center in lieu of $285,000 bail. He is scheduled to appear in court Friday.
I am a little concerned about the bail amounts for each individual. The woman who allegedly engaged in acts with the autistic boy was only held on $100,000 bail, while the electrician who allegedly taped unsuspecting women in the nude was being held on almost $300,000 bail.
That doesn't sound fair to me. I am much more concerned about the person who is inflicting actual physical harm on another...especially when the alleged victim is a minor versus an adult that was merely filmed.
Recent Comments